Thursday 28th March 2024

Home » breaking » Currently Reading:

In an Interview in 1982 . . . The Wanderer Asks … Phyllis Schlafly About … Era; Abortion; Chances For Another Amendment; Biased Polls; What Now?

September 15, 2016 breaking No Comments

By PAUL A. FISHER

Mrs. Phyllis Schlafly has been called “One of the 25 most influential women in the United States” (World Almanac), and Good Housekeeping magazine said she is “one of the 10 most ad­mired women in the world.” Those accolades are understandable. The attractive and dynamic mother has, with her lawyer husband, Fred, raised six high-achieving children, and she has almost single-handedly defeated the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA).
The Alton, Ill., housewife received a Master of Arts degree from Harvard University in 1945, and was awarded a law degree by the Washington University Law School in 1978. As a practicing attorney she has testified before numerous State and Congressional Committees. Her first book, A Choice Not An Echo, was a best seller when it was first published in 1964. Since that time she has written eight other books on a wide variety of subjects.
As a syndicated columnist, Mrs. Schlafly’s twice weekly commentary is distributed nationwide by Copley News Service. Additionally she is or has been a television and radio commentator, and ap­pears frequently on media talk shows.
In this exclusive interview, Mrs. Schlafly, who is national president of Eagle Forum and national chairman of Stop ERA, discusses how she became involved in the Equal Rights Amendment, some of the problems with the proposal, and what can be expected from her in the future.

Q. What were you doing, Mrs. 5chlafly, before the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) captured your at­tention?
A. I was bringing up my six children, volunteering in politics, and doing a little free lance writing. I had my first best-selling book in 1964, and I started my Phyllis Schlafly Report in 1967.
Q. What specific thing prompted you to oppose ERA?
A. Somebody invited me to engage in a debate on the subject. I really didn’t want to do it, because I knew little about the subject at the time. At the time of the invitation, I said I didn’t know which side I would be on. The person who invited me said: “I’ll send you all the material. After reading it I know which side you will be on.”
So, I had the debate, and used the research I developed for it in my first newsletter, which was published in 1972. It was terribly popular, and things took off into orbit after that.
Q. What was the status of the ERA at the time you became involved?
A. It passed Congress March 22nd, 1972, a few weeks after my first newsletter. Then, in the first year, it came up for ratification in Illinois, and I helped defeat it there. In the fall of 1972, I brought together friends from about 30 states, and we started “Stop ERA.”
Q. What specific aspect of the amendment did you oppose at the outset?
A. The fact that it would draft women, and that it would take away rights of wives. Also, that it would give more power to the federal government.
Q. So you weren’t involved in the amendment during its passage through Congress?
A. No, I was not involved at all.
Q. Why do you think it moved so easily through Congress and then through a number of states during its early stages?
A. A handful of people went down there and lobbied it through. A couple dozen women convinced the men this is what women wanted.
Q. And at that point there was no serious opposition to the amendment?
A. There was no opposition at all, except for Sam Ervin in the Senate and Leonor Sullivan in the House.
Q. The Senator from North Carolina and the Congress­woman from Missouri?
A. That’s right.

UNFAIR EXTENSION OF TIME

Q. Would you comment on the three-year extension of the ERA after it failed to win ratification during the seven years allowed when the legislation first passed Congress? I believe the additional three years were approved by a simple majority vote in both Houses.
A. That’s right. They ignored the two-thirds requirement in Article Five of the Constitution. The unfair extension was put through by (President) Carter lob­byists. It was grievously unfair. They very clearly wanted an extension for states to switch from no to yes, but not from yes to no. That is from disapproving the amendment to approving it, but not the other way around. They defeated the fair play amendment proposed by Sen. Jake Garn (R., Ut.).
Q. What was that?
A. It was to allow states to switch either way.
Q. Oh, yes, I see. How badly was that defeated?
A. They got a majority, but it was not a two-thirds majority.
Q. Does that tell us something about how the nation is run on a number of issues?
A. Well, yes, it does. They got the Justice Department to put out a crooked brief saying this is o.k. They got the White House to push it.
“CROOKED” BRIEF

Q. What do you mean by “a crooked brief?”
A. Well, to give you one clear example: The Justice Department brief given to the House Judiciary Com­mittee and used throughout that debate, said the original time period in the ERA resolution was “at least seven years.” Now, the actual wording in the ERA resolution was “within seven years.”
Of course, they also got the Justice Department to say it was o.k. for them to do it without the two-thirds majority that Article 5 (of the Constitution) requires.
Q. Oh, it was the Justice Department that made the constitutional judgment on that legislation?
A. The Justice Department rendered a political opinion….
Q. Hasn’t that been challenged?
A. Sure, it’s been challenged. That’s the case we won in the federal district court on Dec. 23rd, 1981, after two-and­- one-half years in the federal courts. And we won it on all counts. The court held that the extension was illegal and I that recision is legal.
Then the libs took it to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court stayed it for the time being. We don’t know what they will do know.
Q. Will failure to obtain the necessary number of state ratifications moot the issue?
A. It all depends on whether the Supreme Court holds that the extension was illegal and that recision is legal. A lot of people are betting that the Supreme Court will say it’s moot, and duck the issue.
Q. Regardless, they won’t decide it in this term.
A. No.

RESTROOMS IN COMMON?

Q. Turning to the military aspects which involve placing women in combat. That, of course is serious. But what about women and men sharing common rest rooms, locker-rooms and dormitories. Isn’t that also a problem?
A. Do you mean in the military, or generally?
Q. Generally?
A. Well, let’s go back to what the ERA would do. ERA would require every law, federal or state, every federal and state regulation – everything that is covered by public funding to be sex neutral: to treat men and women exactly the same.
A lot of people have testified, including the presidents of the American Bar Association, that it would require that sex be treated exactly like we now treat race.
I think the best prediction of what the ERA will do is to ask yourself the question: how do we do it on race? All their lawyers say the Supreme Court has never held that sex has to be treated just like race. You ask yourself how we treat it, on race, then you will know what will happen under the ERA.
Q. That would mean across the board?
A. Sure, that means across the board, and it does quite a lot to the school systems of this country. For example, it would wipe out all the exceptions in Title IX, which allows all-girl or all-boy schools, colleges, sports, social events, dormitory living facilities, fraternities, sororities, or whatever.
Q. Do the proponents argue that it will not take place?
A. Not seriously. The lawyers usually do not deny that, they just avoid it. It’s kind of like they do on the draft issue. They don’t deny it, they just slip into prevarications or irrelevancies.
Q. They look upon it as a bogeyperson that is raised to frighten people. . .?
A. Or they ridicule it.

ERA AND ABORTION

Q. Many clergymen, including Catholics, Protestants, and Jews, insist that passage of the ERA would have no bearing on abortion. Would abortion be an appropriate means to allow women to be equal by not carrying babies?
A. The final decision on that will be made by the Supreme Court. It won’t be made by Fr. Hesburgh, some nuns, or some clergymen. You can ask, “Who knows how the Supreme Court will decide?” But we do know for sure how the abortionists will argue.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has already argued in a brief in Massachusetts (which has a state ERA) that the ERA requires the payment of tax funds for abortion. This is argued on the theory that abortion is an operation performed only on women.Therefore, they say, it is within the definition of tax discrimination to deny public funds for a medical procedure that is performed only on women.
They won their case, and Massachusetts has to pay tax funds for abortion. The Supreme Court of that state did not deign to tell us what they thought about that argument. It really doesn’t matter, because the Supreme Court can do what it wants anyway, but we know for sure how the abortionists will argue.
Under the ERA there would be immediate action to declare the Hyde Amendment unconstitutional, because it denies the payment of federal funds for a medical procedure performed only on women, and, therefore is within the definition of sex discrimination.
Would they win? The Hyde Amendment was upheld only by a 5 to 4 majority under the present constitution. All they have to do is convince one Justice, who is already pro-abortion, that the ERA makes the difference. I think they would win.
You can argue: we don’t know. But there is no way to deny how the abortionists will argue, and they have all the massive litigative skill of the ACLU behind them.

WILL THERE BE ANOTHER ERA?

Q. Regarding Cong. (Henry) Hyde, he said on a radio program in Chicago, according to a press report, that the Equal Rights Amendment can be re-worded, and he predicted the House Judiciary Committee would meet on July 1st and report out another ERA. Reportedly, he said it will pass Congress.
Are you familiar with the Congressman’s statement?
A. Yes, I’m very familiar with that, and that was taken very much out of context. Fifteen minutes of Hyde’s in­terview was devoted to explaining what is wrong with the ERA. The statement you refer to was very much taken out of context. Of course, the press seized on that and headlined it.
Q. Do you believe another ERA will be coming before Congress?
A. I believe it will be introduced. I do not believe it will come out of the Judiciary Committee of either the House or Senate.
Q. Both of those committees are considered very liberal. . . .
A. Oh, they’re terrible.
Q. But you don’t think those committees would clear such a proposal.
A. I don’t think they will, but if another ERA proposal does get to the floor, I don’t think it will get the necessary two-thirds vote.
Q. You have traveled around the country a great deal and have spoken on this issue. Do you find people are wearied of the issue?
A. They are absolutely sick and tired of it. Hyde, for example, believes there should be a cooling-off period.
Q. What is the underlying rational, or the driving force behind the E RA?
A. The radicals who want to see in the ERA the vehicle to achieve their goals.
 Q. What are their goals?
A. Their goals are: tax-funded abortions, lesbian privileges, massive federal child care, drafting women, and a federal solution for every problem.

POLLS BIASED

Q. I haven’t followed nor analyzed this closely, but the proponents of the ERA contend that different polls show the mass of American people approve of the ERA. Are those polling questions loaded in your estimation?
A. Yes they are very loaded. For example, a recent Harris poll contained three sentences before the question was asked. Sentence One declared that if you are for women’s rights you are for the ERA. That is extremely prejudicial, as well as false.
Sentence Two gave a fake argument for the ERA by telling the respondents that it will provide jobs.
Sentence Three gave a fake argument against the ERA which did not touch any of the major arguments in op­position to it. And then they asked people whether they are for or against the amendment.
Q. Is that typical of most of the polls which have been conducted on the issue?
A. It is typical. Most of the polls will ask: Are you for the Equal Rights Amendment which will give equal rights to women? I don’t know how much you have studied polls, but that is a very biased question. Who wants to stand up and say they are against women?

WHAT NOW?

Q. Right.
What will Phyllis Schlafly do now? Fold up her tent?
A. No, we’ve got a great movement. We’re going to keep going. We not only defeated the ERA, but we defeated (President) Carter’s plans to draft women.
We’re going to elect candidates. We’re going to work for the economic life of the traditional family. We are going to work in the education field, and we are going to work in the area of national defense.
Q. What do you plan to do in the educational field?
A. Our people have a lot of different projects. I have a project to teach reading by the phonics method the way I taught my children to read.
Q. Have you thought of running for public office?
A. No, I can’t think of any job that would be better than what I’m doing now.

 

Share Button

2019 The Wanderer Printing Co.

Vatican and USCCB leave transgender policy texts unpublished

While U.S. bishops have made headlines for releasing policies addressing gender identity and pastoral ministry, guidelines on the subject have been drafted but not published by both the U.S. bishops’ conference and the Vatican’s doctrinal office, leaving diocesan bishops to…Continue Reading

Biden says Pope Francis told him to continue receiving communion, amid scrutiny over pro-abortion policies

President Biden said that Pope Francis, during their meeting Friday in Vatican City, told him that he should continue to receive communion, amid heightened scrutiny of the Catholic president’s pro-abortion policies.  The president, following the approximately 90-minute-long meeting, a key…Continue Reading

Federal judge rules in favor of Gov. DeSantis’ mask mandate ban

MIAMI (LifeSiteNews) – A federal judge this week handed Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis another legal victory on his mask mandate ban for schools. On Wednesday, Judge K. Michael Moore of the Southern District of Florida denied a petition from…Continue Reading

The Eucharist should not be received unworthily, says Nigerian cardinal

Priests have a duty to remind Catholics not to receive the Eucharist in a state of serious sin and to make confession easily available, a Nigerian cardinal said at the International Eucharistic Congress on Thursday. “It is still the doctrine…Continue Reading

Donald Trump takes a swipe at Catholics and Jews who did not vote for him

Donald Trump complained about Catholics and Jews who did not vote for him in 2020. The former president made the comments in a conference call featuring religious leaders. The move could be seen to shore up his religious conservative base…Continue Reading

Y Gov. Kathy Hochul Admits Andrew Cuomo Covered Up COVID Deaths, 12,000 More Died Than Reported

When it comes to protecting people from COVID, Andrew Cuomo is already the worst governor in America. New York has the second highest death rate per capita, in part because he signed an executive order putting COVID patients in nursing…Continue Reading

Prayers For Cardinal Burke . . . U.S. Cardinal Burke says he has tested positive for COVID-19

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — U.S. Cardinal Raymond L. Burke said he has tested positive for the virus that causes COVID-19. In an Aug. 10 tweet, he wrote: “Praised be Jesus Christ! I wish to inform you that I have recently…Continue Reading

Democrats Block Amendment Banning Late-Term Abortions, Stopping Abortions Up to Birth

Senate Democrats have blocked an amendment that would ban abortions on babies older than 20 weeks. During consideration of the multi-trillion spending package, pro-life Louisiana Senator John Kennedy filed an amendment to ban late-term abortions, but Democrats steadfastly support killing…Continue Reading

Transgender student wins as U.S. Supreme Court rebuffs bathroom appeal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to a transgender former public high school student who waged a six-year legal battle against a Virginia county school board that had barred him from using the bathroom corresponding…Continue Reading

New York priest accused by security guard of assault confirms charges have now been dropped

NEW YORK, June 17, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A New York priest has made his first public statement regarding the dismissal of charges against him.  Today Father George W. Rutler reached out to LifeSiteNews and other media today with the following…Continue Reading

21,000 sign petition protesting US Catholic bishops vote on Biden, abortion

More than 21,000 people have signed a letter calling for U.S. Catholic bishops to cancel a planned vote on whether President Biden should receive communion.  Biden, a Catholic, supports abortion rights and has long come under attack from some Catholics over that…Continue Reading

Bishop Gorman seeks candidates to fill two full time AP level teaching positions for the 2021-2022 school year in the subject areas of Calculus/Statistics and Physics

Bishop Thomas K. Gorman Regional Catholic School is a college preparatory school located in Tyler, Texas. It is an educational ministry of the Catholic Diocese of Tyler led by Bishop Joseph Strickland. The sixth through twelfth grade school provides a…Continue Reading

Untitled 5 Untitled 2

Attention Readers:

  Welcome to our website. Readers who are familiar with The Wanderer know we have been providing Catholic news and orthodox commentary for 150 years in our weekly print edition.


  Our daily version offers only some of what we publish weekly in print. To take advantage of everything The Wanderer publishes, we encourage you to su
bscribe to our flagship weekly print edition, which is mailed every Friday or, if you want to view it in its entirety online, you can subscribe to the E-edition, which is a replica of the print edition.
 
  Our daily edition includes: a selection of material from recent issues of our print edition, news stories updated daily from renowned news sources, access to archives from The Wanderer from the past 10 years, available at a minimum charge (this will be expanded as time goes on). Also: regularly updated features where we go back in time and highlight various columns and news items covered in The Wanderer over the past 150 years. And: a comments section in which your remarks are encouraged, both good and bad, including suggestions.
 
  We encourage you to become a daily visitor to our site. If you appreciate our site, tell your friends. As Catholics we must band together to rediscover our faith and share it with the world if we are to effectively counter a society whose moral culture seems to have no boundaries and a government whose rapidly extending reach threatens to extinguish the rights of people of faith to practice their religion (witness the HHS mandate). Now more than ever, vehicles like The Wanderer are needed for clarification and guidance on the issues of the day.

Catholic, conservative, orthodox, and loyal to the Magisterium have been this journal’s hallmarks for five generations. God willing, our message will continue well into this century and beyond.

Joseph Matt
President, The Wanderer Printing Co.

Untitled 1

Catechism

Today . . .

Abortion Advocates No Longer Consider It “A Necessary Evil,” They Celebrate Killing Babies

Last week, Kamala Harris became the first vice president in U.S. history to make a public visit to an abortion clinic. Though the Democratic party’s support for abortion is nothing new, Harris’ Planned Parenthood appearance does illustrate how that support has become a flagrant celebration of abortion as a public and personal good, essential to both “freedom” and to “healthcare.” At the appearance, Harris proclaimed,  It is only right and fair that people have access…Continue Reading

Wisconsin Supreme Court says Catholic charity group cannot claim religious tax exemption

The Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a major Catholic charity group’s activities were not “primarily” religious under state law, stripping the group of a key tax break and ordering it to pay into the state unemployment system. Catholic Charities Bureau (CCB) last year argued that the state had improperly removed its designation as a religious organization.  The charity filed a lawsuit after the state said it did not qualify to be considered as an organization…Continue Reading

Walgreens and CVS Will Start Selling Abortion Pills That Kill Babies

The two largest pharmacies in America will start selling abortion pills this month that end the lives of unborn children by starting them to death. Walgreens and CVS will both sell the abortion pills despite the fact that they kill a developing human being and have killed at least dozens of women and injured tens of thousands more. They plan to initially roll out abortion drug sales in Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, California…Continue Reading

Cardinal Burke announces novena to Our Lady of Guadalupe for ‘crises of our age’

VATICAN CITY (PerMariam) — Raymond Cardinal Burke has announced the start of a global, nine-month novena to Our Lady of Guadalupe, calling on Catholics to beseech Mary’s intercession on the Church and the world in the face of the “crises of our age.” In a new endeavour published online over the weekend, Cardinal Burke announced a novena beginning in March, and culminating on the feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe on December 12.

Texas attorney general targets Catholic nonprofit, alleges it facilitates illegal immigration

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Feb 21, 2024 / 21:15 pm Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is trying to shut down a Catholic nonprofit organization in El Paso based on allegations that the group may be facilitating illegal immigration, harboring immigrants who entered the country illegally, and engaging in human smuggling.  Paxton filed a lawsuit against the nonprofit Annunciation House, which has operated in the state for nearly 50 years. The lawsuit asks the District Court of El Paso…Continue Reading

The King of Kings

Cindy Paslawski We are at the end of the Church year. We began with Advent a year ago, commemorating the time awaiting the coming of the Christ and we are ending these weeks later with a vision of the future, a vision of Christ the King of the Universe on His throne before us all.…Continue Reading

7,000 Pro-Lifers March In London

By STEVEN ERTELT LONDON (LifeNews) — Over the weekend, some seven thousand pro-life people in the UK participated in the March for Life in London to protest abortion.They marched to Parliament Square on Saturday, September 2 under the banner of “Freedom to Live” and had to deal with a handful of radical abortion activists.During the…Continue Reading

An Appeal For Prayer For The Armenian People

By RAYMOND LEO CARDINAL BURKE (Editor’s Note: His Eminence Raymond Cardinal Burke on August 29, 2023, issued this prayer for the Armenian people, noting their unceasing love for Christ, even in the face of persecution.) + + On the Feast of the Beheading of St. John the Baptist, having a few days ago celebrated the…Continue Reading

Robert Hickson, Founding Member Of Christendom College, Dies At 80

By MAIKE HICKSON FRONT ROYAL, Va. (LifeSiteNews) — Robert David Hickson, Jr., of Front Royal, Va., died at his home on September 2, 2023, at 21:29 p.m. after several months of suffering and after having received the Last Rites of the Catholic Church. He was surrounded by friends and family.Robert is survived by me —…Continue Reading

The Real Hero Of “Sound of Freedom”… Says The Film Has Strengthened The Fight Against Child Trafficking

By ANA PAULA MORALES (CNA) —Tim Ballard, a former U.S. Homeland Security agent who risked his life to fight child trafficking, discussed the impact of the movie Sound of Freedom, which is based on his work, in an August 29 interview with ACI Prensa, CNA’s Spanish-language news partner. “I’ve spent more than 20 years helping…Continue Reading

Advertisement

Our Catholic Faith (Section B of print edition)

Catholic Replies

Editor’s Note: This lesson on medical-moral issues is taken from the book Catholicism & Ethics. Please feel free to use the series for high schoolers or adults. We will continue to welcome your questions for the column as well. The email and postal addresses are given at the end of this column. Special Course On Catholicism And Ethics (Pages 53-59)…Continue Reading

Color Politics An Impediment To Faith

By FR. KEVIN M. CUSICK The USCCB is rightly concerned about racism, as they should be about any sin. In the 2018 statement Open Wide Our Hearts, they affirm the dignity of every human person: “But racism still profoundly affects our culture, and it has no place in the Christian heart. This evil causes great harm to its victims, and…Continue Reading

Trademarks Of The True Messiah

By MSGR. CHARLES POPE (Editor’s Note: Msgr. Charles Pope posted this essay on September 2, and it is reprinted here with permission.) + + In Sunday’s Gospel the Lord firmly sets before us the need for the cross, not as an end in itself, but as the way to glory. Let’s consider the Gospel in three stages.First: The Pattern That…Continue Reading

A Beacon Of Light… The Holy Cross And Jesus’ Unconditional Love

By FR. RICHARD D. BRETON Each year on September 14 the Church celebrates the Feast Day of the Exultation of the Holy Cross. The Feast Day of the Triumph of the Holy Cross commemorates the day St. Helen found the True Cross. It is fitting then, that today we should focus on the final moments of Jesus’ life on the…Continue Reading

Our Ways Must Become More Like God’s Ways

By FR. ROBERT ALTIER Twenty-Fifth Sunday In Ordinary Time (YR A) Readings: Isaiah 55:6-9Phil. 1:20c-24, 27aMatt. 20:1-16a In the first reading today, God tells us through the Prophet Isaiah that His thoughts are not our thoughts and His ways are not our ways. This should not come as a surprise to anyone, especially when we look at what the Lord…Continue Reading

The Devil And The Democrats

By FR. DENIS WILDE, OSA States such as Minnesota, California, Maryland, and others, in all cases with Democrat-controlled legislatures, are on a fast track to not only allow unborn babies to be murdered on demand as a woman’s “constitutional right” but also to allow infanticide.Our nation has gotten so used to the moral evil of killing in the womb that…Continue Reading

Crushed But Unbroken . . . The Martyrdom Of St. Margaret Clitherow

By RAY CAVANAUGH The late-1500s were a tough time for Catholics in England, where the Reformation was in full gear. A 1581 law prohibited Catholic religious ceremonies. And a 1584 Act of Parliament mandated that all Catholic priests leave the country or else face execution. Some chose to remain, however, so they could continue serving the faithful.Also taking huge risks…Continue Reading

Advertisement(2)