Wednesday 18th July 2018

Home » Featured Today » Currently Reading:

Neither Left Nor Right, But Catholic. . . The Supreme Court’s Overturning Of Bad Precedents: Don’t Hold Your Breath

December 11, 2017 Featured Today No Comments

By STEPHEN M. KRASON

(Editor’s Note: Stephen M. Krason’s Neither Left nor Right, but Catholic column appears monthly [sometimes bimonthly]. He is professor of political science and legal studies and associate director of the Veritas Center for Ethics in Public Life at Franciscan University of Steubenville. He is also co-founder and president of the Society of Catholic Social Scientists. Among his books are: Abortion: Politics, Morality, and the Constitution; The Transformation of the American Democratic Republic; Catholicism and American Political Ideologies, and a novel about a president who uses power in the way suggested in this column, American Cincinnatus.)

+ + +

In his recent book, Nixon’s White House Wars, Patrick J. Buchanan writes about how most of Richard Nixon’s Supreme Court nominees — Buchanan was an aide to Nixon — did not turn out to be the “judicial restraintists” that the thirty-seventh president had hoped for.
Buchanan says that has been a problem for Republican presidents generally. From Nixon up until Trump, they have appointed twelve justices and the Democrats have appointed only four (Justice Neil Gorsuch makes thirteen). Still, there has been no constitutional counterrevolution away from the path of cultural decay that he says began with the Warren Court (1953-1969). He tells us that the Warren Court “was regarded by many as an ally of the counterculture that had arisen in the 1960s” and refers to its “campaign to de-Christianize America,” which included barring prayer and Bible reading from public schools and sweeping away legal restraints on obscenity and pornography.
The culture wars just advanced much farther under later courts (the Burger, Rehnquist, and Roberts Courts) even though they had a preponderance of Republican-appointed justices, with the Supreme Court enshrining abortion rights, a right to sodomy, and an equal protection right to same-sex “marriage” into the Constitution.
He notes that the Republican presidents failed to change the court for different reasons, such as insufficient vetting of their appointees, key people in their administrations not wanting restraintist nominees, and justices who simply didn’t want to overturn precedents (even bad ones). What’s evident from what Buchanan writes is that the only way most presidents think they can change the court’s direction, by appointment, is quite unreliable.
The Supreme Court, to be sure, has overturned or at least narrowed previous decisions. Few of the overturned decisions have had broad, culture-wide significance. Probably the most noteworthy example of that was racial segregation, when in its 1954 Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka decision it overturned Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which had given a constitutional imprimatur to “separate but equal.”
The largest single group of overturns on constitutional questions has concerned Bill of Rights provisions pertinent to criminal justice. Generally, these have gone in the direction of granting more rights to those accused of crimes. A number of these overturns were done by the Warren Court and probably ignited most of the opposition to it.
On the cultural side, the court under Chief Justice Warren Burger seemed to backtrack on the Warren Court’s controversial First Amendment protection of obscenity and pornography that Buchanan alluded to when in Miller v. California (1973) it gave state and local governments more freedom to carry out prosecutions.
While the Supreme Court never gave constitutional protection to pornography per se, the legal definition it gave to it beginning in its 1957 Roth v. U.S. decision had made it extremely difficult to prosecute or legally restrain. Roth itself was a sharp departure from longstanding legal principles in American law that had refused to countenance the obscene, pornographic, or salacious in the least.
In fact, until the 1950s the ruling standard in the U.S. had been that expression could be suppressed if it could adversely affect the most vulnerable persons in the public (typically youth). Miller didn’t exactly overturn Roth, but “tightened” the legal definition. The problem was that the damage had already been done, so that today we see few pornography prosecutions other than for child pornography.
One might say that the Warren Court’s decisions both aided the cause of the 1960s sexual revolution and helped engrain pornography into the fabric of American life.
During World War II, in Skinner v. Oklahoma, the Supreme Court stepped back on its 1920s-era Buck v. Bell decision which had upheld forced sterilization of the feeble-minded. Maybe the Nazi experience registered with the court, even though it was not precisely an overturn and didn’t signal exactly a turn away from its earlier embrace of eugenics.
Actually, the Supreme Court’s overturns or narrowing of decisions on culture wars-type questions in recent years have mostly been to further the repudiation of traditional culture. Lawrence v. Texas (2003) overturned Bowers v. Hardwick (1986) to suddenly discover a constitutional right to sodomy. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) overturned the 1972 decision of Baker v. Nelson to hold that same-sex “marriage” was an equal protection right under the Constitution.
While in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), the court upheld such requirements as qualified parental consent for minors’ abortions, informed consent, and a one-day waiting period for abortions — in some sense permitting limits on abortion at the margins — it reaffirmed its 1973 Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton precedents that legalized abortion, for all practical purposes, up to birth.
It also erected the notion of the autonomous self — man as the essential arbiter of morality and all meaning — into a constitutional principle in the famous “mystery passage” in its opinion: “At the heart of liberty is the right to define one’s own concept of existence, of meaning, of the universe, and of the mystery of human life.”
A series of Supreme Court decisions, starting with Everson v. Board of Education in 1947, had the effect of largely driving religion out of the public arena, especially in the realm of public education. For all practical purposes, the effect of these decisions has been to install secularism as the official religion in America. That, of course, reversed the traditional respect for religion — especially Christianity — that had been a given in American law before that time.
While over the years the court has narrowed its Everson-era precedents that established a “rigid wall of separation between church and state,” this has been very much at the margins. For example, it has permitted very limited state support for sectarian schools and such things as prayers commencing state legislative sessions.
Other twentieth-century examples of overturns or a narrowing of precedents on First Amendment freedoms were seen in the Jehovah’s Witness flag salute cases and the Communist Party membership cases.
In 1943, the court made one of its quickest reversals in history in West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette. It did this after its decision three years before in Minersville School District v. Gobitis that held that Jehovah’s Witness children could not refuse to salute the flag in public school classrooms — the Witnesses believed that doing this showed allegiance to the state as a salvific force instead of God — led to a wave of persecutions against the sect. Barnette protected the Witness children’s religious liberty rights not to salute the flag.
In Dennis v. U.S. (1951), the court made it easier to prosecute Communist Party membership under the Smith Act. Then, in Yates v. U.S. (1957) — again, the Warren Court was now in place — it required a heightened standard of evidence to sustain such a prosecution so that just membership in the party couldn’t be prosecuted. Providing more associational freedom protection for Communists was maybe legally defensible, but hardly promoted the cause of traditional culture.
Earlier in the twentieth century, at the time of FDR’s New Deal, the Supreme Court made some noteworthy overturns of its precedents on the subjects of the commerce clause, national taxing and spending power, and federalism that had the effects of altering the distribution of power between the federal and state governments, and opening the door to economic regulation.
When one looks back at these noted cases of the Supreme Court’s overturning of its precedents, one observes a couple of things. First, when the court has changed it has usually followed a change in the predominant elite opinion in America. So, the court’s church-state jurisprudence changed with Everson after the secularization of the intelligentsia and the opinion-making class in America early in the twentieth century. It only slightly modified its course later on when it became apparent that the results were contradictory and unworkable.
(When the late eminent Catholic constitutional lawyer William Bentley Ball argued one of the later cases before the Supreme Court, one justice jokingly but truthfully asked him if he was seeking to reconcile the court’s church-state decisions.)
The court for all practical purposes protected obscenity and pornography when the elite insisted there should be no restraints on speech and also decided that there was nothing wrong with pornography. Rights to abortion, sodomy, and same-sex “marriage” came only after elite opinion shifted to support them and the Sexual Revolution that the elite spearheaded ground itself into American culture.
The court retreated on eugenics only after elite support for it weakened — for a time — with the Nazi atrocities. Brown and its progeny came only after an elite that earlier in American history didn’t pay much attention to it began to oppose racial segregation and took up the cause of civil rights.
The court altered its thinking about the Smith Act only because elite opinion — which from the Progressive Era onward has tilted leftward — started to have an expansive notion of civil liberties that included protecting Communists. While the excesses of the McCarthy period may have helped precipitate that, American liberalism has long had the view that there are no enemies to the left — as New Dealer Ronald Reagan found out in the late 1940s when he started to speak against not just fascism but also Communism in Hollywood.
Then, of course, even though FDR’s “court-packing” plan was the trigger, elite opinion had shifted from supporting some version of economic laissez-faire to strong state economic regulation in the interest of justice.
The upshot of this is that unless Republican presidents are ultra-conscientious in examining the thinking of their court nominees, they are likely to just continue the kind of jurisprudence that Buchanan says Nixon failed to change. That means not only avoiding appointing closet judicial leftists, but also selecting justices who have the strength of character and intellectual depth to resist the influences of the mainstream of the legal profession and legal academy and their judicial leftist brethren.

A Head-On Challenge

Still, there’s another problem: the simple reluctance of Supreme Court justices historically to overturn precedents — even bad ones. That means that a Republican president would have to know his prospective appointees inside and out and be sure of their willingness to step out of the usual judicial mold, in addition to being sure of the soundness of their philosophical and constitutional commitments. That’s no small order — even for a president whose own thought is completely sound (which often isn’t the case with Republican presidents).
Nor can presidents expect Congress to check the court by doing something like withdrawing its jurisdiction over certain matters. That has seldom happened historically, and in our era Congress is usually ideologically stalemated and has become the weakest — indeed, it seems hapless — branch of the federal government.
In the final analysis, what this means is that a president deeply committed to changing the course of the culture wars — which the Supreme Court has played a big part in — and restoring the Constitution can’t just play the appointment game. He has to be prepared to challenge the court head-on as FDR, and even more so, Andrew Jackson did (in the Cherokee Indian case, Jackson simply refused to carry out the court’s decision).
Such a president must be prepared to obstruct and resist blatantly unconstitutional decisions — many of the decisions that have advanced the cultural revolution in America have had little or no constitutional foundation — of the Supreme Court and other federal courts when the Supreme Court lets them stand. In other words, it is long past the time for a forceful — but prudent — stance of presidential resistance to the judiciary.

Share Button

2017 The Wanderer Printing Co.

Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter Elects New Superior General

LINCOLN, Neb. — The general chapter of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter, a society of apostolic life that celebrates the extraordinary form of the Roman rite, Monday elected Father Andrzej Komorowski as its next superior general. The July 9…Continue Reading

Catholic-heavy Supreme Court moves right as the church moves left

(RNS) — With his nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to replace the retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy, President Trump has succeeded in doing for the judicial branch what he has often failed or neglected to do in his administration: acting efficiently…Continue Reading

Election of the Superior General . . . Society of Saint Pius X

Election of the Superior General On July 11, 2018, Father Davide Pagliarani was elected Superior General, for a mandate of 12 years, by the 4th General Chapter of the Society of Saint Pius X. The new Superior General is 47…Continue Reading

Paradoxes and indicators of Capella’s and McCarrick’s cases

These days we will find out whether Monsignor Carlo Alberto Capella, the former advisor to the Washington nunciature that the Vatican sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for possession and distribution of “large quantities” of child pornography, will present an appeal…Continue Reading

Diocese led by pro-gay bishop says it’s ‘up to each parish’ whether to promote homosexuality

LEXINGTON, Kentucky, July 3, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – A Catholic church in the heart of Appalachia has attracted media attention for the Gay Pride Month banner stretched across its front lawn. The local ordinary, Bishop John Stowe, has a record of collaborating with a…Continue Reading

Al Gore: Pope Francis a ‘moral force’ for solving climate crisis

(Vatican.news) Nobel Peace Prize Winner and former U.S. Vice President, Al Gore, is one of the world’s most vocal defenders of the environment. His 2007 documentary film, “An Inconvenient Truth”, won an Oscar and his Climate Reality Project recently hosted…Continue Reading

Catholic bishops heading to border to tackle family separation issues

HOUSTON, Texas (KTRK) — A delegation of Catholic bishops from across the country are heading to the border on Monday. Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, will lead the delegation in its visit to the…Continue Reading

Catholic Church teaching on homosexuality ‘evil’, McAleese says

The Catholic Church’s teaching on homosexuality is “evil”, former president Mary McAleese has said. Speaking ahead of her inaugural participation in the Dublin Pride event on Saturday, where she will march with her son Justin and his husband, the former…Continue Reading

Senate Will Vote Before Elections on Replacing Pro-Abortion Justice Anthony Kennedy

The United States Senate will vote before the elections this November on a replacement for pro-abortion Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell made that announcement today shortly after the surprising but welcome announcement that the longtime abortion…Continue Reading

Cardinal Burke, Bishop Schneider respond to Pope Francis’ inflight intercommunion comments

ROME, June 27, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) — The reception of Holy Communion in the Catholic Church — even in exceptional cases — by a Protestant or other non-Catholic constitutes a “lie” that betrays the Apostolic tradition and the Church’s constant practice…Continue Reading

German Bishops Publish Intercommunion Handout with a Rhetorical Trick

Today, the German bishops have published their very controversial pastoral handout which allows Protestant spouses of Catholics, in certain cases, to receive Holy Communion. Since Pope Francis, on 21 June, objected to a national bishops’ conference publishing such an official text, the…Continue Reading

Vikings host ‘LGBTQ summit’ to promote ‘inclusion’ in sports

EAGAN, Minnesota, June 21, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – The Minnesota Vikings are hosting a conference and fundraiser today for “LGBTQ inclusion in sports,” the first of its kind in the National Football League (NFL). The event will include speeches, interviews, and…Continue Reading

Untitled 5 Untitled 2

Attention Readers:

  Welcome to our website. Readers who are familiar with The Wanderer know we have been providing Catholic news and orthodox commentary for 150 years in our weekly print edition.


  Our daily version offers only some of what we publish weekly in print. To take advantage of everything The Wanderer publishes, we encourage you to su
bscribe to our flagship weekly print edition, which is mailed every Friday or, if you want to view it in its entirety online, you can subscribe to the E-edition, which is a replica of the print edition.
 
  Our daily edition includes: a selection of material from recent issues of our print edition, news stories updated daily from renowned news sources, access to archives from The Wanderer from the past 10 years, available at a minimum charge (this will be expanded as time goes on). Also: regularly updated features where we go back in time and highlight various columns and news items covered in The Wanderer over the past 150 years. And: a comments section in which your remarks are encouraged, both good and bad, including suggestions.
 
  We encourage you to become a daily visitor to our site. If you appreciate our site, tell your friends. As Catholics we must band together to rediscover our faith and share it with the world if we are to effectively counter a society whose moral culture seems to have no boundaries and a government whose rapidly extending reach threatens to extinguish the rights of people of faith to practice their religion (witness the HHS mandate). Now more than ever, vehicles like The Wanderer are needed for clarification and guidance on the issues of the day.

Catholic, conservative, orthodox, and loyal to the Magisterium have been this journal’s hallmarks for five generations. God willing, our message will continue well into this century and beyond.

Joseph Matt
President, The Wanderer Printing Co.

Untitled 1

Interview With Cardinal Burke . . . Discriminating Mercy: Defending Christ And His Church With True Love

Cburke3

  By DON FIER (Editor’s Note: His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke, Patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta and Founder of the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in La Crosse, Wis., graciously took time out of his busy schedule to grant The Wanderer a wide-ranging interview during a recent visit to the Shrine. Included among the topics…Continue Reading

Developing Lives Of Peace After The Heart Of Mary

By RAYMOND LEO CARDINAL BURKE (Editor’s Note: His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke delivered the address below at the 32nd Annual Church Teaches Forum, “The Message of Fatima: Peace for the World,” Galt House, Louisville, Ky., July 22, 2017. The address is reprinted here with the kind permission of Cardinal Burke. All rights reserved. This is part one of the…Continue Reading

Catechism

Today . . .

British pro-lifers say abortion clinic ‘buffer zones’ harm women and children

London, England, Jul 12, 2018 / 12:49 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- After a decision from the United Kingdom’s High Court, two women are attempting to overturn a ban on prayer and public discussion of abortion near a British abortion clinic. On July 2, the High Court of England and Wales upheld a “buffer zone” imposed by Ealing Council, west London, around a Marie Stopes abortion clinic. The zone prevents any pro-life gathering or speech, inc

Calligraphers face jail time for not promoting same-sex ‘weddings’

PHOENIX, Arizona, July 13, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) — Two Arizona calligraphy artists faced with fines and jail time for declining to take part in promoting gay “weddings” are asking the state’s Supreme Court to hear their challenge to the city of Phoenix’s law that compels them create artwork that violates their religious beliefs. Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski, owners of Brush & Nib Studio, face up to six months in jail, $2,500 in fines, and three

Bishop Paprocki disagrees with US bishops’ support for unions that fund abortion, LGBT

SPRINGFIELD, Illinois, July 11, 2018, (LifeSiteNews) – Hailed by free speech and religious liberty advocates alike, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled that public sector employees can no longer be required to pay mandatory fees to support unions which promote causes and political activities – including abortion – to which they are opposed. The ruling has also exposed a significant rift among the nation’s Catholic bishops. Despite public sector unions’ unabashe

Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 9, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Brett Kavanaugh is Donald Trump’s choice to succeed the pro-abortion, pro-gay Justice Anthony Kennedy on the U.S. Supreme Court, the president announced Monday night. Trump praised Kavanaugh’s committment to “equal justice under the law” and called him a “brilliant jurist with a clear and effective writing style.” He is “universally regarded as…one of the finest legal minds of our time.” Kavanaugh formerly clerked for Kennedy. “Justice Kennedy devoted his career to…Continue Reading

Prof fired by Catholic university for defending marriage has huge court win

MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin, July 6, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – The professor forced out by a Jesuit-run Catholic university for blogging about an undergrad student being assailed by his teacher for his having voiced defense of marriage has won in court. In a landmark decision Friday the Wisconsin Supreme Court said Marquette University violated John McAdams’ right to free speech when it suspended him for writing the blog post, and it ordered the University to restore McAdams immediately with his full rank,…Continue Reading

Advertisement(2)

Neither Left Nor Right, But Catholic … Old And New Tyrannies Borne Of Lust

By STEPHEN M. KRASON (Editor’s Note: Stephen M. Krason’s “Neither Left nor Right, but Catholic” column appears monthly [sometimes bimonthly]. He is professor of political science and legal studies and associate director of the Veritas Center for Ethics in Public Life at Franciscan University of Steubenville. He is also co-founder and president of the Society…Continue Reading

A Book Review… What Man Does Not Reverence, He Will Profane

By MITCHELL KALPAKGIAN Society and Sanity, by Frank Sheed (Ignatius Press: San Francisco, 2013), 261 pp. $17.95. Available from www.ignatius.com or at 1-800-651-1531. This new edition of Sheed’s 1953 classic work of apologetics brings to mind the famous myth of Procrustes’ bed. The wicked king captures his victims then tortures them if their legs do…Continue Reading

How Vice Can Absorb Virtue

By DONALD DeMARCO Just as the Devil is at war with God, so too, vices are at war with virtue. The Devil wants people to believe that God does not exist. He also wants people to believe that neither does virtue exist. He would like to demolish virtue. One way of achieving this is to…Continue Reading

Henan, China… New Limits Imposed On The Religious Freedom Of Catholics

BEIJING (AsiaNews) — The Chinese government is approving increasingly restrictive measures against Catholics in the central province of Henan. As Eglises d’Asie reports, five new rules have been imposed which include the requirement of religious working in the province to collect data and information on their faithful. A priest from the Diocese of Zhengzhou reports…Continue Reading

A Book Review… Solzhenitsyn Remembered

By JUDE DOUGHERTY Congdon, Lee. Solzhenitsyn: The Historical-Spiritual Destinies of Russia and the West. DeKalb, Ill.: NIV Press, 2017; 163 pp. This book is descriptive of the prophetic voice of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1918-2008), who was convinced that the West has set out on a road similar to that which “led Russia into the abyss.” Solzhenitsyn…Continue Reading

Advertisement

Our Catholic Faith (Section B of print edition)

Sheep Without A Shepherd

By FR. ROBERT ALTIER Sixteenth Sunday In Ordinary Time (YR B) Readings: Jer. 23:1-6 Eph. 2:13-18 Mark 6:30-34 In the first reading today, God speaks a word of woe through the Prophet Jeremiah to the shepherds who mislead the Lord’s flock entrusted to their care. God says that these shepherds scattered the flock and drove them away and did not…Continue Reading

A Leaven In The World . . . In Death The Church Gives Everything

By FR. KEVIN M. CUSICK Funerals, as many priests have learned, can often be pastorally challenging and problematic episodes. Grieving family members who are not dealing with death on a regular basis by practicing their faith are suddenly confronted with its reality upon the passing of a parent or other family member. Parents who have to bury a child sometimes…Continue Reading

Martin Luther… The Man And The Myth

By RAYMOND DE SOUZA, KM Part 2 (Editor’s Note: As this October marks the 500th anniversary of Martin Luther’s nailing his 95 theses to the door of the Castle Church in Wittenberg, Raymond de Souza is taking a break from his usual apologetics to correct the popular image of Luther.) + + + In the last article, I quoted from…Continue Reading

The Anatomy Of A Moral Act

By DON FIER Last week, as we considered the role that human freedom plays in the economy of salvation, it was immediately acknowledged that “man’s freedom is limited and fallible” (Catechism of the Catholic Church [CCC], n. 1739). Free will, so wondrously bestowed upon man as an essential element of his great dignity of being created “in the image and…Continue Reading

Catholic Replies

Q. What can one say to a teenage daughter or granddaughter who wears skimpy bathing suits? I know that is the “style” these days, but it seems wrong for many reasons. — M.M., Virginia. A. When our five daughters were teens, my wife and I ruled out the wearing of skimpy bathing suits, as well as skin-tight jeans or shorts…Continue Reading

Catholic Heroes… St. Veronica Giuliani

By CAROLE BRESLIN In July, the month of the Precious Blood, the Catholic Church remembers saints by the name of Veronica. On July 12, the memorial of Veronica (meaning “true image”), the saint from the first century who presented her veil to wipe the face of Jesus, is celebrated. Three days before that, on July 9, St. Veronica Giuliani is…Continue Reading

Catholic Heroes… Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati

By CAROLE BRESLIN Our Lord had a special love for the poor when He walked this earth. At one time He rebuked one of the apostles, saying, “The poor you will always have with you” (Matt. 26:11). Rather than avoiding the destitute or shun the homeless, Christians are called to love them as we love ourselves. At the beginning of…Continue Reading