By DEXTER DUGGAN
It used to sound like a persuasive argument that the Supreme Court wouldn’t dare impose “same-sex marriage” on the nation because that only would be inviting decades of unresolved social strife, much like the court caused by imprudently and impudently forcing radical permissive abortion throughout the land in 1973.
After all, Americans from coast to coast voted to uphold traditional marriage in state ballot measures. But that was before lower-court judges arrogantly began to overturn these democratically enacted affirmations of historic marriage from east to west. What would the High Court have to lose now, in its own eyes, by forcing through more judicial imperialism? What, indeed?
The justices would know the social strife to come. But, given the degenerate elite’s current urgency to mandate sex-disoriented “marriage” on the entire society, maybe that’s some strife the justices are willing to endure. It’s getting close to a half century after the abortion mandate was imposed, but elitists see there’s just a manageable amount of continued social disruption.
Their media friends are in love as ever with massive abortion, and growing legions of Barack Obama-appointed judges will expect to break society’s back to enforce his will about marriage. Twenty-five years ago, it was incredibly unthinkable that serious sexual disorientation would be mandated as a fundamental right to equality, but that’s where the elite have trundled us.
A quarter-century from now? People imprisoned because they disagree with the “right” of “marriage equality”? Children yanked from their parents in order to be brainwashed in the constitutional views of the ACLU? Churches closed down and bulldozed that defy “national law”? A lot can happen in the coming 25 years if submerged in this toxic bath.
Well before the High court accepted this “gay marriage” case, Catholic adoption agencies were shut down because they wouldn’t surrender the welfare of youngsters to homosexual “couples.” It didn’t matter that other adoption agencies willingly would turn kids over to the homosexuals. Catholics must do so as well or be hammered down.
Obama demands that traditionally religious people follow his twisted views or endure heavy penalties. Whether they escape the penalties depends on which judge gets their case. Homosexual activists sue people like florists and bakers for declining to affirm “gay marriage.”
What does the High Court have to fear from us if it redefines marriage? Unless we can show a remarkable firmness that makes justices jittery, the answer is nothing. And then its arrogant decision would make us plenty jittery.
Powered by WPtouch Mobile Suite for WordPress