Sunday 29th November 2020

Home » Frontpage » Currently Reading:

Once Again . . . Supreme Court Ignores Rules To Pull Surprise On Suffering Nation

June 21, 2020 Frontpage No Comments


While the U.S. Supreme Court went outside proper legal procedures to devise its mandate favoring sexual disorientation in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, there would be multiple impacts far beyond the High Court’s walls.
The nation saw still more damage to its people and society from this contrivance announced on June 15 in the cause of advancing moral rebellion shielded by the black-robed bench, this time written by President Trump’s relatively recent nominee, Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch.
The court’s impermissible legislating from the bench supposedly was done in the interest of clarity in 2020 in forbidding sex discrimination as prohibited by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The Gorsuch majority indefensibly expanded the concept of sex discrimination to include sexual orientation and subjective gender identity — concepts never intended by Congress in 1964, and never passed by Congress since.
The website of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says: “Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin.”
Meanwhile, conservatives had to weigh some serious questions arising, one of them rather immediate, and another flowing from it.
How would Bostock affect President Trump’s reelection, and what was to become of the foundational belief that if only a conservative majority of legal scholars could be placed on the court after decades of political blood, sweat and tears, then moral tradition and sanity would be preserved, to the well-being of the nation?
Having been sharply disappointed in June by one of Trump’s acclaimed picks to the High Court, would some or many conservative voters be less motivated to turn out for the president in November? And even if they did, would they have less confidence in the results of another Supreme Court vacancy he might have the opportunity to fill?
Bostock was delivered at a time when the U.S. already was wrenched by rioting and looting leftists supposedly protesting racism, even while the coronavirus pandemic still pummeled society.
The political levers of left-wing power in society were revealed even here, when politicians and other officials welcomed and praised the “anti-racism” crowds packed together on the streets, even while they continued to warn against ordinary people starting to come outside, even if socially distanced, because of the power of the germs.
Veteran pro-life activist Michael Hichborn, president of the traditional-values Lepanto Institute, lamented at Facebook on June 15, just after the Supreme Court ruling, that “2020 is officially the worst year on record.”
The times were a graphic reminder that traditionalists should work as if everything depended on them, but to pray as if everything depended on God.
A longstanding basic defense for voting Republican is that GOP victories eventually would deliver the desirable kind of courts, preeminently the High Court, and these bodies would reject left-wing assaults on good sense and the Constitution itself.
Such a High Court would rule on what the law actually said, not on what leftists imagined the law should say if only the Founders and their proper successors had been as smart as said leftists.
After Trump assumed the presidency, he faithfully delivered on his promise of filling two Supreme Court vacancies with apparently impeccably credentialed jurists who had been on his 2016 pre-election list of those he’d choose from, Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh.
Trump kept his word, but Gorsuch deflated expectations on June 15. This wasn’t Trump’s fault, but Gorsuch may have taken more glow off a Trump reelection campaign already confronted with other challenges. The least of which, though, was lackluster Dementia Dem Joe Biden, a fierce foe of traditional morality wrapped up in a wan package, Trump’s presumptive main opponent in the November election.
Gorsuch replaced the late conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, while Kavanaugh served to tilt the balance by taking the seat of “moderate” retired Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Behold, the court held a narrow conservative majority, five to four. Of course, that meant one of the conservatives still could break ranks to join the four liberals for a majority on their side. But at least one of the liberals also might choose to join the five conservatives in an opinion, delivering at least six to three for the traditionalists’ side.
Alas, the court’s liberal justices break ranks about as often as their liberal Democrat politician friends, which means approximately never. And just as true, the conservative justices are more likely to wander here and there like conservative GOP politicians — most frequently Chief Justice and somewhat conservative John Roberts.
Thus, Bostock was written by the supposedly impeccable Gorsuch, joined by wanderlust-struck Roberts, giving the lockstep four liberals a six-to-three majority.
There are considerations beyond the strictly legal that are pitfalls for these judicial conservatives, such as a desire to please some dominant quarters in the national structure, the social pressures in the Beltway bubble, and even the power of threats both outright and more covert.
Who can forget, for instance, left-wing, pro-abortion Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) just last March at a raucous rally near the High Court’s building? He threatened Gorsuch and Kavanaugh by only their last names that they better vote the way he wanted on a Louisiana law under review that provided health protections for women at abortuaries.
“You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price,” Schumer fulminated in the tenor of a mob boss. “You won’t know what hit you if you go forward with these awful decisions.”
National conservative commentator Quin Hillyer told The Wanderer on June 17: “Conservative jurists will not always walk in lockstep. It is extremely frustrating to see Justice Gorsuch (and the never-reliable Chief Justice Roberts) produce a decision this bad, but it’s still far better to have a Gorsuch whose reason may go haywire than to have a Justice (Sonia) Sotomayor who will almost always determine what liberal outcome she wants and then make up a way to get there.
“That’s why it’s always better to have judges chosen by those somewhere on the right than by those somewhere on the left,” Hillyer added.
In a column posted at the New York Post on June 15, legal commentator Josh Hammer noted, as did many others, that leftists repeatedly failed to expand the definition of sex discrimination in Congress — until Trump’s Justice Gorsuch, acting as though he’s a legislator, suddenly did it for them.
“Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried to enact much of this agenda legislatively in 2019 with the so-called Equality Act — and failed,” Hammer wrote. “All it took was a Republican justice to impose it — nationwide via judicial fiat.
“Religious employers’ conscience rights aside,” Hammer continued, “long-settled employment law has now been thrown into chaos. The court concedes that such issues as sex-specific bathrooms, locker rooms, and sports teams will be on the chopping block in future litigation.
“As my former boss, Judge James C. Ho of the Fifth Circuit, noted in a similar case last year, the underlying legal issues ‘affect every American who uses the restroom at any restaurant, buys clothes at any department store, or exercises at any gym’,” Hammer said.
The Gorsuch majority’s ruling was called shocking and surprising. But also, no doubt, routinely gratifying to imperious leftists grown used to courts imposing what democratic governance would not.


Gary McCaleb, a longtime Arizona attorney-activist for traditional values, posted on Facebook on June 15 that he agreed with the analysis at National Review by Ed Whelan, president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, on Gorsuch’s handiwork in Bostock. McCaleb added a thought on the High Court itself.
“Mr. Whelan cuts to the core here: In a sadly ironic bit of doublethink, Justice Gorsuch dismisses standard statutory analysis as raw policy choices, while making his own raw policy choice to rewrite Title VII to protect not sex, but affectional preferences and gender-identity ideology,” McCaleb said.
“Even gender-identity advocates admit that gender is not sex, and as my feminist friends note, that ideology erases women.”
In addition, McCaleb said, “I’m beginning to think that the Supreme Court has run its course; perhaps it is time to defund SCOTUS and settle appellate splits by establishing a plurality of appellate courts landing in the same place. Slower, but SCOTUS is no speed demon now and at least congressional intent would not rest on two ‘textualists’ who are not.”
Whelan posted at National Review on June 15 that Justice Samuel Alito, dissenting, “explains that the proper textualist inquiry concerns what the words of a law ‘conveyed to reasonable people at the time’ it was enacted. . . . ‘Textualists do not read statutes as if they were messages picked up by a powerful radio telescope from a distant and unknown civilization. . . . In 1964, ordinary Americans reading the text of Title VII would not have dreamed that discrimination because of sex meant discrimination because of sexual orientation, much less gender identity’.”
Whelan went on to say that “the longstanding acceptance of sex-specific restrooms, locker rooms, shower facilities, and dress codes — all of which require taking account of an employee’s sex — severely complicates Gorsuch’s claim that any employer policy that requires taking account of an employee’s sex clearly discriminates on the basis of sex under Title VII.”
The conservative Liberty Counsel website quoted from Justice Kavanaugh’s dissent: “I have the greatest, and unyielding, respect for my colleagues and for their good faith. But when this court usurps the role of Congress, as it does today, the public understandably becomes confused about who the policymakers really are in our system of separated powers, and inevitably becomes cynical about the oft-repeated aspiration that judges base their decisions on law rather than on personal preference.”
Joy Pullman, executive editor of The Federalist website, posted on June 16: “When courts legislate, they disenfranchise the people. They invalidate our votes, our God-given natural right to rule ourselves. By adding words to statute that Congress did not put there, and has repeatedly and explicitly refused to add, these judges are destroying our Constitution, our way of life, the people’s sovereignty, and thus our human dignity.”
Conservatives can’t let Republicans get away with big talk while pretending that the bureaucracy and judiciary are beyond being disciplined, Pullman said.
“They’d prefer to give rousing speeches about our rights at conventions like CPAC while scapegoating our continued loss of these rights on the judges and the bureaucracy they’re supposed to oversee. That needs to end, and for it to end, all constitutional hypocrites need to be made uncomfortable until they do the right thing,” she said.
Pullmann added that some of the justices who “just passed an LGBT version of Roe v. Wade” were put on the court by Republicans.

No One Has Agreed To This

The Washington Examiner editorialized on June 17: “Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids discrimination based on ‘sex,’ full stop. It doesn’t address any issues of sexual practice or gender self-identification. Nor would it have passed Congress in 1964 if it had tried to do so. In other words, no one ever agreed to what these judges are now imposing….
“Gorsuch’s premise is wrong. Men and women are naturally different, in profound ways,” the Examiner added. “These differences would persist in a world of full legal equality. We say this not based upon religious belief, but upon political, biological, cultural, and legal realities that no amount of casuistry can erase.”
Also on June 15, again thumbing its nose at the rule of law and American citizens, the Supreme Court declined to take up the Trump administration’s case against California’s 2017 “sanctuary” law for illegal aliens, which defies federal law.
Southern California’s Orange County Register posted on June 15 that county Sheriff Don Barnes said he believes the law has made the state less safe: “Communication among law-enforcement partners on shared threats is critical to the safety of all members of the public. I urge lawmakers to reconsider this law.”
The Register reported: “The law prohibits state and local police from asking people who’ve been arrested — except for those charged with serious crimes — about their immigration status. It also bars police from notifying federal agents when an immigrant is being released from jail, or from holding an immigrant after their release date so they can be transferred to immigration authorities.”

Share Button

2019 The Wanderer Printing Co.

Twitter Feed

Its no wonder < 30% of Catholics believe in the Real Presence - when a bishop of the Church publicly proclaims communion for a baby killer.

Cardinal Zen could not get a meeting with the Pope about the religious persecution of the faithful in China, but…. (And no masks at the Vatican?)

In the days ahead this nation will test the rule of law - the likes of which haven't been seen in modern time. Our country is at risk.

Load More...

‘All-star,’ ‘brilliant jurist’: Pro-life leaders thrilled Trump nominated Barrett to Supreme Court

September 26, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Supreme Court nominee Judge Amy Coney Barrett is “an absolute all-star” and “a judicial role model for the next generation,” pro-life leaders said today.  If confirmed, Barrett will replace pro-abortion Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who died just…Continue Reading

Farewell, Uncle Di: Father Paul Mankowski, RIP

My editorial career has brought me into close contact with quite a few impressive thinkers. I have worked with famous authors, with noted theologians and philosophers, with canny political strategists, with at least a half-dozen Nobel Prize winners. Among them…Continue Reading

VIDEO: BLM mob threatens, chases Rand Paul down streets of DC

WASHINGTON, D.C., August 28, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky found himself the target of left-wing violence yet again Thursday night as protesters swarmed him as he was leaving the White House, chasing him and his wife…Continue Reading

Planned Parenthood acknowledges Margaret Sanger’s ‘racist legacy’, continues abortions

CNA Staff, Jul 21, 2020 / 11:05 am MT (CNA).- The New York affiliate of the nation’s largest abortion provider said Tuesday it will remove the name of its founder, Margaret Sanger, from its Manhattan building because of her support…Continue Reading

Statue of Virgin Mary beheaded at Tennessee parish

CNA Staff, Jul 15, 2020 / 10:40 am MT (CNA).- A statue of the Blessed Virgin Mary was attacked this weekend at a parish in Chattanooga, Tennessee, the third reported incident against a statue of Mary occuring in the same…Continue Reading

21 doctors tell bishops Communion on tongue ‘safer’ than in hand

June 26, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Twenty-one Austrian doctors have authored a letter appealing their country’s Bishops’ Conference to lift the de facto ban on receiving Holy Communion on the tongue, which has been enforced since Communion in the hand was…Continue Reading

Catholic priest among defenders of St Louis statue

CNA Staff, Jun 27, 2020 / 09:36 pm MT (CNA).- Fr. Stephen Schumacher, a priest of the Archdiocese of St. Louis, was among the defenders of a prominent statue of the city’s namesake as protesters called for its removal Saturday.…Continue Reading

‘I cannot remain silent’: Madison Catholic bishop condemns destruction of religious statues

Denver Newsroom, Jun 24, 2020 / 04:08 pm MT (CNA).- As rioters across the United States target statues depicting historical figures, the Bishop of Madison, Wisconsin on Tuesday denounced that destruction, along with calls to destroy some depictions of Jesus…Continue Reading

John Roberts tries to suppress Reagan’s letter

After three and a half years of legal wrangling, the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in August of 1985 ordered the 16,433 mangled babies’ bodies found in Woodland Hills in 1982 to be turned over to the Guerra-Gutirrez-Alexander Mortuary…Continue Reading

Pope Francis declares Catholic sister killed in Satanic ritual a martyr

Vatican City, Jun 19, 2020 / 12:40 pm MT (CNA).- Pope Francis declared Friday that Sister Maria Laura Mainetti, an Italian religious sister killed by three teenage girls in a Satanic sacrifice, was a martyr for the Catholic faith. The…Continue Reading

Bishop Schneider: Catholics and Muslims share no common faith in God, no common adoration

June 8, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Bishop Athanasius Schneider has once more raised his voice concerning the controversial February 4, 2019 Abu Dhabi Statement on Human Fraternity where Pope Francis and a Grand Imam jointly declared, among other problematic statements, that God wills…Continue Reading

German cardinal criticizes ‘synodal path,’ exhorts German Church to ‘remain Catholic’

COLOGNE, Germany, June 5, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) — Cardinal Rainer Maria Woelki, the head of the Archdiocese of Cologne in Germany, has called on the Church in Germany to strengthen its identity as part of the one, holy, Catholic, and apostolic…Continue Reading

Untitled 5 Untitled 2

Attention Readers:

  Welcome to our website. Readers who are familiar with The Wanderer know we have been providing Catholic news and orthodox commentary for 150 years in our weekly print edition.

  Our daily version offers only some of what we publish weekly in print. To take advantage of everything The Wanderer publishes, we encourage you to su
bscribe to our flagship weekly print edition, which is mailed every Friday or, if you want to view it in its entirety online, you can subscribe to the E-edition, which is a replica of the print edition.
  Our daily edition includes: a selection of material from recent issues of our print edition, news stories updated daily from renowned news sources, access to archives from The Wanderer from the past 10 years, available at a minimum charge (this will be expanded as time goes on). Also: regularly updated features where we go back in time and highlight various columns and news items covered in The Wanderer over the past 150 years. And: a comments section in which your remarks are encouraged, both good and bad, including suggestions.
  We encourage you to become a daily visitor to our site. If you appreciate our site, tell your friends. As Catholics we must band together to rediscover our faith and share it with the world if we are to effectively counter a society whose moral culture seems to have no boundaries and a government whose rapidly extending reach threatens to extinguish the rights of people of faith to practice their religion (witness the HHS mandate). Now more than ever, vehicles like The Wanderer are needed for clarification and guidance on the issues of the day.

Catholic, conservative, orthodox, and loyal to the Magisterium have been this journal’s hallmarks for five generations. God willing, our message will continue well into this century and beyond.

Joseph Matt
President, The Wanderer Printing Co.

Untitled 1

Interview With Cardinal Burke . . . Discriminating Mercy: Defending Christ And His Church With True Love

  By DON FIER (Editor’s Note: His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke, Patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta and Founder of the Shrine of Our Lady of Guadalupe in La Crosse, Wis., graciously took time out of his busy schedule to grant The Wanderer a wide-ranging interview during a recent visit to the Shrine. Included among the topics…Continue Reading

Developing Lives Of Peace After The Heart Of Mary

By RAYMOND LEO CARDINAL BURKE (Editor’s Note: His Eminence Raymond Leo Cardinal Burke delivered the address below at the 32nd Annual Church Teaches Forum, “The Message of Fatima: Peace for the World,” Galt House, Louisville, Ky., July 22, 2017. The address is reprinted here with the kind permission of Cardinal Burke. All rights reserved. This is part one of the…Continue Reading


Today . . .

Bishop Malone and Buffalo diocese sued by NY AG over clergy abuse

Washington, D.C. Newsroom, Nov 23, 2020 / 11:40 am MT (CNA).- The State of New York is suing the Diocese of Buffalo and its former bishops for failing to protect children for clergy sex abuse. New York’s Attorney General Letitia James filed a lawsuit on Monday in the state’s supreme court against the diocese. The state also named Bishop Emeritus Richard Malone, retired auxiliary Bishop Edward Grosz, and Buffalo’s apostolic administrator, Bishop Edward Scharfenberger of…Continue Reading

Toronto cardinal rebukes Catholic school board members for barring Catechism reading

CNA Staff, Nov 20, 2020 / 04:48 pm MT (CNA).- Cardinal Thomas Collins of Toronto has rebuked members of the local Catholic school board for refusing to allow a passage of the Catechism of the Catholic Church pertaining to ministry to people with same-sex attraction to be read during a recent meeting. “That a Catholic should be criticized, and effectively be prevented by Catholic Trustees from reading from the Catholic Catechism at a meeting of…Continue Reading

Archbishop Gomez: Biden will ‘support policies’ against ‘fundamental’ Catholic values

CNA Staff, Nov 17, 2020 / 01:40 pm MT (CNA).- The president of the U.S. bishops’ conference has announced the creation of a bishops’ working group to prepare for a Biden presidency. Archbishop Jose Gomez told bishops Tuesday that a future President Biden, as a Catholic, would present unique challenges for the Church in the United States, especially regarding Biden policy positions at odds with Catholic doctrine. “For only the second time, we are anticipating…Continue Reading

Roman Catholic diocese seeks Supreme Court emergency relief over Cuomo coronavirus restrictions

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn is turning to the Supreme Court over coronavirus restrictions that New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo imposed that include limits on how many congregants can gather for religious services. The emergency court filing, submitted Thursday, compares the prohibitions houses of worship face with the relative freedom afforded to many businesses under an order that Cuomo issued in October, in which he designated color-coded zones with varying degrees of limitations.

Pope Francis congratulates Biden on election victory in phone call

CNA Staff, Nov 12, 2020 / 11:35 am MT (CNA).- Presumptive President-elect Joe Biden spoke with Pope Francis on Thursday, his office has announced. The Catholic, former vice president, and presumptive next president was congratulated on his electoral victory by the pope on the morning of Nov. 12. “President-elect Joe Biden spoke this morning with His Holiness Pope Francis. The president-elect thanked His Holiness for extending blessings and congratulations and noted his appreciation for His…Continue Reading

The Bishop Strickland Hour – Week of September 29

Kamala Harris And Julius Caesar

By DONALD DeMARCO Kamala Harris made the following statement during the October 7 vice-presidential debate: “The issues before us couldn’t be more serious. There is the issue of choice, and I will always fight for a woman’s right to make a decision about her own body. It should be her decision and not that of…Continue Reading

Is Trump Exiting Afghanistan — To Attack Iran?

By PATRICK J. BUCHANAN With the Pentagon’s announcement that U.S. forces in Afghanistan will be cut in half — to 2,500 — by inauguration day, after 19 years, it appears the end to America’s longest war may be in sight.The Pentagon also announced a reduction of U.S. troop levels in Iraq to 2,500 by mid-January.…Continue Reading

The View From Nowhere

By JUDE DOUGHERTY “The view from nowhere” is a phrase made famous by Thomas Nagel in a book he published in 1986 by that name. Nagel spoke of the negative effect of reporting that claimed to be neutral, where opposing views, or persons are granted equal validly or deemed equally of a hearing. Supposed impartiality…Continue Reading

A Book Review . . . Resurrection

By JOHN LYON Vodolazkin, Eugene, The Aviator. London: One World Publications; 2018. Translated by Lisa C. Hayden. Available at “Exceptional.” “Amazing.” “Masterful.” “Captivating.” When one reads such summary praise on the dustjacket of a book, one suspects sheer puffery in their placement and disappointment in the anticipated reading. Not so here. The puffery may…Continue Reading

Bishop Daly Of Spokane . . . Says Catholic Schools Must Teach The Faith

By JONAH McKEOWN DENVER (CNA) — The U.S. bishops’ new chairman-elect for Catholic education says he hopes to bring his experience as a Catholic school teacher and president, as well as pastor of two parishes, into his new position.In an increasingly secular society, when people’s lives seem more and more to lack meaning, “our schools…Continue Reading


Our Catholic Faith (Section B of print edition)

Catholic Replies

Editor’s Note: Are you interested in finding a Christmas gift for someone who has everything, except a knowledge of the Catholic faith? Why not give this person one or more of our books? The books available are Catholic Replies and Catholic Replies 2, All Generations Will Call Me Blessed, Who Do You Say That I Am?, Catholicism & Reason (Apologetics),…Continue Reading

A Leaven In The World… Shepherds vs. Sheep

By FR. KEVIN M. CUSICK “Feed my sheep.” Many of you will likely read this as you are basking in the gastronomical afterglow of the Thanksgiving feast. I wish you and yours a blessed one.All holiday-related excesses aside, eating is life. We give thanks this week each year in particular for the bounty God has provided through the blessing of…Continue Reading

Catholic Family Life . . . The Answer To The Evils That Beset Us

By JAMES MONTI In Frank Capra’s classic 1939 movie Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, we are introduced to an idealistic young man, Jefferson Smith (played by Jimmy Stuart), who unwittingly finds himself propelled into a pitched David-and-Goliath battle with a cadre of corrupt politicians, businessmen, and journalists all determined to crush him and what he stands for.In the character of…Continue Reading

The Command To Watch

By FR. ROBERT ALTIER Sunday Sermon for November 29, 2020First Sunday Of Advent (YR B) Readings: Isaiah 63:16b-17, 19b, 64:2-71 Cor. 1:3-9Mark 13:33-37 In the Gospel reading our Lord tells us something of great importance. Of course, since everything He said is the Word of God, it is all of great importance. However, the last line in the Gospel is…Continue Reading

Listen To The Gospel of Zacchaeus

By FR. JAMES ALTMAN In the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, Amen.Dear family, let it never be said that I don’t have a sense of humor! Every now and then something humorous comes along and I throw it into these meditations, so here you go:“I was going to tell you a COVID…Continue Reading

Catholic Heroes… Martyrs Of Purity

By DEB PIROCH In these days of liberalized sexuality, the secular population has no concept of the value the chaste soul has before God. It must also be said that there are martyrs to chastity who have died rather than submit to sexual activity or rape, even under the threat of death.Why, you ask, is this the case? The Sixth…Continue Reading

Catholic Heroes . . . St. Agatha, Virgin And Martyr

Catholic Heroes . . .St. Agatha, Virgin And Martyr By DEB PIROCH One of the most highly revered saints from the early days of the founding of the Church is St. Agatha, virgin and martyr (c. 231-251). As such, she is one of seven female saints mentioned in the Canon of the Mass. She came from a wealthy Sicilian family…Continue Reading